Various Advancements In Field Of Healthcare-Myassignmenthelp.Com

Question: Discuss About The Various Advancements In Field Of Healthcare? Answer: Introduction In recent times, there has been various advancements in the field of healthcare. The healthcare delivery has become complex and the objective of government and other stakeholders is to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of healthcare delivery (Barbour, 1997). The objective of this paper is to discuss the models of healthcare. The two key models of healthcare that would be discussed in this paper are biomedical model of healthcare and the social model of health. There are different models of healthcare based on the specific way in which healthcare system is divided. One of the traditional and widely used model of health care is biomedical model of healthcare. This model of biomedical is based on the germ theory. The advocates of this model of healthcare suggests that any illness is caused by the germs and therefore, the effort should be made to eliminate the germs (Germov, 2005). The central idea of this model is that germs enter human body through water, food or air. This model was widely used in the early twentieth century and with this model the objective was to figure out the root cause of various infectious diseases. The underlying assumption with this model is that every illness has a cause that could be attributed to germs and the illness affects the human body in a standard and predictable manner (Germov, 2005). Another widely used model of healthcare is the social model of health. The social model of health is relatively new than the biomedical model of health. This model of social model of health is also known as the public health model. With this model, the focus is to make efforts to improve the health of society at large (Barbour, 1997). With this model, the emphasis is to identify the social determinants of health and make efforts to develop a healthy society. The advocates of social model of health suggests that health is social responsibility of government and it is important that the government should make efforts to improve the health of community members. The underlying assumption of social model of health is that the social, economic, political, social, etc. factors are responsible for the health of a person (Barbour, 1997). The above paper discusses the two key health models. Essentially, any government or any stakeholder can use any of the above or any third model to assess the health conditions of people in the society. The key thing is that different stakeholder must join hands to improve the healthcare delivery in the country and make Australia as better place to live. Health Human Rights The health care system in any country is one of the most important industry for any government. There is an increased focus of Australian Government on health care industry. However, these efforts are not enough to meet the expectations of all the stakeholders. It is correct to say that the health care enterprise is one of the most important parts of the Australian social system and of our economic system as well. The issue of health and human rights is an interesting issue to debate. There have been various debates around the health and human rights. It would be correct to say that health care quality improvement is the focus of the policy makers in the country and this effort falls within the human right (Hunt, 2006). The objective of this paper is to discuss the health and human rights that patients and the members of society at large should have. In Australia, health care delivery happens through private and public players. The external environmental factors have deep impact on health care delivery. The political factor is one of the most important external factor as government act as the guardian of public health (Hunt, 2006). It is important that health rights of human are intact and not compromised in any of the health delivery mechanism. The health rights and the human rights of patients are based on the six objectives. The six aims of health and human rights are safe, effective, patient-centered, timely, efficient, and equitable. A health care system that achieves major gains in these six areas would be far better at meeting patient needs. By efficient it means avoiding waste, including waste of equipment, supplies, ideas, and energy. There is a desperate need to make our healthcare systems more efficient. The efficiency can be improved with an increase use of health care technology. The strategy to focus on health care technology would certainly be beneficial for health care organizations in long term. However, the challenge is to manage the short-term cost. In addition, the human resource shortage is also a challenge to manage the health rights of humans in an effective manner (Ivanov Oden, 2013). It is also important to mention that different section of the society should be given a platform where they can manage or execute their health rights. It essentially means that our healthcare system should not be biased towards any particular group or section (Ivanov Oden, 2013). The government would need to make certain intervention to ensure that health rights of humans are well preserved. Conclusion The above paper discusses the human and health rights of individuals. Based on the above discussion it can be said that it is critical that the private players, public players and other stakeholders should come together to overcome the issues. Here government must act as a facilitator that could provide a platform where different stakeholders can work together. References Barbour, A. (1997).Caring for patients: A critique of the medical model. Stanford University Press.operations Germov, J. (2005). Imagining health problems as social issues.Second Opinion, 3-24. Hunt, P. (2006). The human right to the highest attainable standard of health: new opportunities and challenges.Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene,100(7), 603-607. Ivanov, L. L., Oden, T. L. (2013). Public health nursing, ethics and human rights.Public Health Nursing,30(3), 231